Gaming Monitors Are Getting Too Fast at Computex 2025

Three cutting-edge gaming monitors were unveiled at Computex, each pushing the boundaries of refresh rates. The standout is the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG, boasting a 1080p resolution with an astonishing 610Hz refresh rate. Meanwhile, both MSI and Acer have introduced 1440p displays with 500Hz refresh rates, which are challenging to drive even with top-tier hardware like the RTX 5090 and multi-frame generation technology.

Acer's offering, the Predator X27U F5, not only features a high refresh rate but also a QD-OLED panel, ensuring exceptional color accuracy. Initially, this monitor will launch in Europe and China, starting at €899. Acer has confirmed plans to bring it to the US, though no pricing details were provided due to ongoing tariff negotiations with retailers. Given the rising costs of tech products in the US, affordability remains a concern.

MSI's 27-inch MPG 271QR X50 also utilizes a QD-OLED panel, but what sets it apart is its innovative AI feature. As reported by PC Gamer, the monitor includes a sensor that detects when you step away, triggering the display to turn off and initiate burn-in protection. This AI-driven approach to preventing burn-in, a common issue with OLED displays, is particularly noteworthy, especially for gaming monitors that often display static images.

Do Gaming Monitors Need to Be This Fast?

The introduction of monitors with such high refresh rates, particularly the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG at 610Hz, raises questions about their necessity. Achieving such high frame rates, even at 1080p, demands not only a powerful GPU like the RTX 5090 but also a robust CPU capable of feeding data to the graphics card at these speeds. Technologies like Nvidia Reflex and frame generation can help, but at around 600 fps, a high-performance CPU is essential.

The advantage of such high refresh rates lies in significantly reduced render latency, which is crucial for competitive gaming. Games like Counter-Strike 2 exemplify this, where players opt for the lowest settings to maximize frame rates and minimize input lag, which can be the difference between winning and losing. However, the cost of these ultra-fast monitors may be prohibitive for many, prompting the question of whether the performance gains justify the expense.